Differential attenuation patterns: 19 August 2011: Difference between revisions
Pat kennedy (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Introduction== Scattered thunderstorms developed in several portions of the CSU-CHILL coverage area during the afternoon hours of 19 August 2011. For an ~10 minute time period, the storm...) |
Pat kennedy (talk | contribs) (plots added) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
Scattered thunderstorms developed in several portions of the CSU-CHILL coverage area during the afternoon hours of 19 August 2011. For an ~10 minute time period, the storms developing a short distance east of the radar produced a reflectivity pattern with a maximum reflectivity axis that was radially aligned with the radar. Radar pulses propagating along this heavy rain axis experienced the accumulated effects of high concentrations of oblate raindrops: The greater retardation experienced by the H polarized pulses relative to the V polarized pulses caused large differential propagation phase (Phidp) shifts to be observed. The oblate drops also made the attenuation losses greater for the H waves than for the V waves. The resultant preferential weakening of the H signal level introduced a negative bias into the Differential Reflectivity (Zdr) values.These effects are shown in the following plots made from a low elevation PPI scan through the heavy rain area. | Scattered thunderstorms developed in several portions of the CSU-CHILL coverage area during the afternoon hours of 19 August 2011. For an ~10 minute time period, the storms developing a short distance east of the radar produced a reflectivity pattern with a maximum reflectivity axis that was radially aligned with the radar. Radar pulses propagating along this heavy rain axis experienced the accumulated effects of high concentrations of oblate raindrops: The greater retardation experienced by the H polarized pulses relative to the V polarized pulses caused large differential propagation phase (Phidp) shifts to be observed. The oblate drops also made the attenuation losses greater for the H waves than for the V waves. The resultant preferential weakening of the H signal level introduced a negative bias into the Differential Reflectivity (Zdr) values.These effects are shown in the following plots made from a low elevation PPI scan through the heavy rain area. | ||
==Reflectivity== | |||
[[Image:19aug2011 zc anot.png|center]] | |||
==Differential propagation phase== | |||
[[Image:19aug2011 pf anot.png|center]] | |||
==Differential reflectivity== | |||
[[Image:19aug2011 dc kdp anot.png|center]] | |||
Revision as of 05:21, 26 October 2011
Introduction
Scattered thunderstorms developed in several portions of the CSU-CHILL coverage area during the afternoon hours of 19 August 2011. For an ~10 minute time period, the storms developing a short distance east of the radar produced a reflectivity pattern with a maximum reflectivity axis that was radially aligned with the radar. Radar pulses propagating along this heavy rain axis experienced the accumulated effects of high concentrations of oblate raindrops: The greater retardation experienced by the H polarized pulses relative to the V polarized pulses caused large differential propagation phase (Phidp) shifts to be observed. The oblate drops also made the attenuation losses greater for the H waves than for the V waves. The resultant preferential weakening of the H signal level introduced a negative bias into the Differential Reflectivity (Zdr) values.These effects are shown in the following plots made from a low elevation PPI scan through the heavy rain area.
Reflectivity
Differential propagation phase
Differential reflectivity
