Bright band polarimetric signatures: Difference between revisions

From CSU-CHILL

No edit summary
m (Fixed image formatting to be more sane)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Reflectivity contours overlaid on polarimetric color fills:
==Conceptual Summary==
[[Image:7jun03_rh10.png|center|RhoHV RHI plot]]
Frozen hydrometeors begin to melt as they fall through the 0&deg;C height level.  The first hydrometeors to completely melt are the smaller, less massive particles.  The larger particles spend more time in various partially frozen/water-coated states as they melt while descending.  Additionally, particle aggregation and breakup also frequently occur at temperatures near 0&deg;C.  The net result of these processes often generates distinctive polarimetric signatures.  Reflectivity is enhanced as the particles initially develop a wet outer surface, producing the classical "bright band" pattern.  With increasing distance below the 0&deg;C level, only the larger sized hydrometeors remain partially frozen.  However, due to their large diameters, they strongly influence the polarimetric parameters <ref name="herzegh">Herzegh, P. H. and A. R. Jameson. 1992: Observing Precipitation through Dual-Polarization Radar. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, pp 1365-1374.</ref>. These large melting snow particles generally wobble as they fall; on average the orientation of their long axis is more nearly horizontal than vertical.
[[Image:7jun03_ldr.png|center|LDR RHI plot]]
[[Image:7jun03_zdr.png|center|ZDR RHI plot]]


=Conceptual Summary=
The large particles thus cause the most positive <math>Z_{dr}</math> and the least negative LDR values to be found several hundred meters below the height of the maximum reflectivity.  At lower heights, these radar signal peaks fade out as the hydrometeors completely melt into quasi-spherical drops.
Frozen hydrometeors begin to melt as they fall through the 0C height level.  The first hydrometeors to completely melt are the smaller, less massive particles.  The larger particles spend more time in various partially frozen / water-coated states as they melt while descending.  Additionally, particle aggregation and breakup also frequently occur at temperatures near 0C.  The net result of these processes often generates distinctive polarimetric signatures.  Reflectivity is enhanced as the particles initially develop a wet outer surface, producing the classical "bright band" pattern.  With increasing distance below the 0C level, only the larger sized hydrometeors remain partially frozen.  However, due to their large diameters, they strongly influence the polarimetric parameters.  These large melting snow particles generally wobble as they fall; on average the orientation of their long axis is more nearly horizontal than vertical.
The large particles thus cause the most positive ZDR and the least negative LDR values to be found several hundred meters below the height of the maximum reflectivity.  At lower heights, these radar signal peaks fade out as the hydrometeors completely melt into quasi-spherical drops.


[[Image:7jun03_yel_rh_anot.png|right|Annotated RhoHV PPI plot]]
<center>
[[Image:7jun03_yellow_dbz.png|right|dBZ PPI plot]]
{| {{Prettytable}}
Examples of these general bright band patterns are shown in the above overlay plots.  It is apparent that the ZDR and LDR peaks are found somewhat below the maximum reflectivity height.  The correlation between the horizontally and vertically polarized return signals (RhoHV) also has a distinct minimum in the vicinity of the melting level.  The coexistence of small, completely melted drops and larger, irregularly-shaped, melting aggregated snow particles causes a localized RhoHV decrease in this mixed particle regime.  (The effects of differential phase shift upon backscatter from the large, wet aggregates can also reduce RhoHV (Zrnic et al., 1993).
! {{Hl3}} | PPI display of Reflectivity and <math>\rho_{HV}</math>
|-
| [[Image:7jun03_yellow_dbz.png|Reflectivity PPI plot]]
|-
| [[Image:7jun03_yel_rh_anot.png|Annotated <math>\rho_{HV}</math> PPI plot]]
|}
</center>


In PPI scans through widespread stratifrom precipitation, bright band radar patterns have a roughly circular shape since the melting level is encountered at a fairly constant range on each sweep.  Identification of the melting level in PPI data can be improved through the consideration of the polarimetric data fields.  The two images below are taken from the the same PPI sweep.  The melting level pattern is better defined by the RhoHV minimum than by the reflectivity bright band.


=VCHILL=
 
 
 
Examples of these general bright band patterns are shown in the above overlay plots.  It is apparent that the <math>Z_{dr}</math> and LDR peaks are found somewhat below the maximum reflectivity height.  The correlation between the horizontally and vertically polarized return signals (<math>\rho_{HV}</math>) also has a distinct minimum in the vicinity of the melting level.  The coexistence of small, completely melted drops and larger, irregularly-shaped, melting aggregated snow particles causes a localized <math>\rho_{HV}</math> decrease in this mixed particle regime.  The effects of differential phase shift upon backscatter from the large, wet aggregates can also reduce <math>\rho_{HV}</math> <ref name="zrnic">Zrnic, D. S., N. Balakrishnan, C. L. Ziegler, V. N. Bringi, K. Aydin, and T. Matejka. 1993: Polarimetric Signatures in the Stratiform Region of a Mesoscale Convective System.  J. Appl. Meteor., 32, pp 678-693</ref>.
 
In PPI scans through widespread stratifrom precipitation, bright band radar patterns have a roughly circular shape since the melting level is encountered at a fairly constant range on each sweep.  Identification of the melting level in PPI data can be improved through the consideration of the polarimetric data fields.  The two images below are taken from the the same PPI sweep.  The melting level pattern is better defined by the <math>\rho_{HV}</math> minimum than by the reflectivity bright band.
 
<center>
{| {{Prettytable}}
! {{Hl3}} | Reflectivity contours overlaid on polarimetric color fills
|-
| [[Image:7jun03_rh10.png|frame|<math>\rho_{HV}</math> RHI plot]]
|-
| [[Image:7jun03_ldr.png|frame|LDR RHI plot]]
|-
| [[Image:7jun03_zdr.png|frame|<math>Z_{dr}</math> RHI plot]]
|}
</center>
 
==VCHILL==
{{Main|[[VCHILL]]}}
{{Main|[[VCHILL]]}}
[http://chill.colostate.edu/java/vchill.php?bookmark=edu:Polarization%20Applications,RhoHV:%20Bright%20Band%20RHI&plot=RhoHV Load example in VCHILL]
[http://chill.colostate.edu/java/vchill.php?bookmark=edu:Polarization%20Applications,RhoHV:%20Bright%20Band%20RHI&plot=RhoHV Load example in VCHILL]


=References=
==References==
* Herzegh, P. H. and A. R. Jameson. 1992: Observing Precipitation through Dual-Polarization Radar. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, pp 1365-1374.
<references/>
* Zrnic, D. S., N. Balakrishnan, C. L. Ziegler, V. N. Bringi, K. Aydin, and T. Matejka. 1993: Polarimetric Signatures in the Stratiform Region of a Mesoscale Convective System.  J. Appl. Meteor., 32, pp 678-693.
*  
*  


[[Category:VCHILL Educational Bookmark]]
[[Category:VCHILL Educational Bookmark]]

Latest revision as of 09:45, 23 June 2008

Conceptual Summary

Frozen hydrometeors begin to melt as they fall through the 0°C height level. The first hydrometeors to completely melt are the smaller, less massive particles. The larger particles spend more time in various partially frozen/water-coated states as they melt while descending. Additionally, particle aggregation and breakup also frequently occur at temperatures near 0°C. The net result of these processes often generates distinctive polarimetric signatures. Reflectivity is enhanced as the particles initially develop a wet outer surface, producing the classical "bright band" pattern. With increasing distance below the 0°C level, only the larger sized hydrometeors remain partially frozen. However, due to their large diameters, they strongly influence the polarimetric parameters [1]. These large melting snow particles generally wobble as they fall; on average the orientation of their long axis is more nearly horizontal than vertical.

The large particles thus cause the most positive and the least negative LDR values to be found several hundred meters below the height of the maximum reflectivity. At lower heights, these radar signal peaks fade out as the hydrometeors completely melt into quasi-spherical drops.

PPI display of Reflectivity and
Reflectivity PPI plot
Annotated '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000003-QINU`"' PPI plot



Examples of these general bright band patterns are shown in the above overlay plots. It is apparent that the and LDR peaks are found somewhat below the maximum reflectivity height. The correlation between the horizontally and vertically polarized return signals () also has a distinct minimum in the vicinity of the melting level. The coexistence of small, completely melted drops and larger, irregularly-shaped, melting aggregated snow particles causes a localized decrease in this mixed particle regime. The effects of differential phase shift upon backscatter from the large, wet aggregates can also reduce [2].

In PPI scans through widespread stratifrom precipitation, bright band radar patterns have a roughly circular shape since the melting level is encountered at a fairly constant range on each sweep. Identification of the melting level in PPI data can be improved through the consideration of the polarimetric data fields. The two images below are taken from the the same PPI sweep. The melting level pattern is better defined by the minimum than by the reflectivity bright band.

Reflectivity contours overlaid on polarimetric color fills
RHI plot
LDR RHI plot
RHI plot

VCHILL

Main article: VCHILL

Load example in VCHILL

References

  1. Herzegh, P. H. and A. R. Jameson. 1992: Observing Precipitation through Dual-Polarization Radar. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73, pp 1365-1374.
  2. Zrnic, D. S., N. Balakrishnan, C. L. Ziegler, V. N. Bringi, K. Aydin, and T. Matejka. 1993: Polarimetric Signatures in the Stratiform Region of a Mesoscale Convective System. J. Appl. Meteor., 32, pp 678-693